New report on attitudes towards nanomaterials and nanotechnology among Swedish expert stakeholders
Simon Larsson, Åsa Boholm & Magnus Jansson (Gothenburg Research Institute, GRI, 2017)
Svensk sammanfattning hittar du här.
The aim of this study is to investigate attitudes towards nanomaterials and nanotechnology among Swedish expert stakeholders. The study explores the views of these experts on a number of topics in connection to nanotechnology innovation with a focus on perceived risk, perceived benefits, risk regulation, and risk management.
In January 2017, we distributed a web-based questionnaire to 237 individual experts at government agencies, business corporations, and other relevant organisations. The experts had a self-rated interest in, or connection to, nanomaterials and nanotechnology in their work at their organisation.
This study contributes to a multidisciplinary research field addressing questions about innovation and foresight, risk perception, and regulation of nanomaterials and nanotechnology in the public domain.
This study makes several claims.
1. The topic of nanomaterials and nanotechnology engages a broad range of Swedish stakeholders in many different ways, including, but not limited to, research and research funding, risk assessment, product development, as well as regulation and legislation.
2. Experts generally emphasize the benefits of nanotechnology and nanomaterials, but perceived benefit and perceived risk varies with educational background and organizational affiliation.
3. How experts assess risk and benefit varies depending on area of application (for example medicine, cosmetics, coatings, electronics, agriculture and food).
4. Experts are generally supportive of further regulation of nanomaterials and nanotechnology. They are relatively negative to taxation and self-regulation as regulatory measures and relatively positive to selective prohibition. There is also disagreement over appropriate regulatory measures among respondents.
5. High perceived risk correlates with a more positive attitude to regulation, and high perceived benefit correlates with lower support for regulation.
6. A common and shared belief is that regulation should be based on science, and that public involvement is undesirable.
Du kanske även gillar
Nya rön: Långa kolnanorör ger upphov till mesoteliom och mekanismen är densamma som för asbestfibrer
Forskare vid Medical Research Council Toxicology Unit i Leicester i England har rapporterat att såväl långa kolnanorör som asbestfibrer ger upphov till cancerformen mesoteliom hos möss. De har också identifierat mekanismer som förklarar den långa…
Den 25 maj möttes deltagarna i det svenska standardiseringsinstitutets (SIS), tekniska kommitté TK 516 Nanoteknik för att diskutera det pågående arbetet och ambitionerna för det fortsatta arbetet under 2018 till och med 2020. De närvarande…
Representatives from Sweden, other EU Member States and Associated countries, the European Commission, OECD and other international bodies and stakeholders, participated in the policy conference entitled "A future-proof approach to nanomaterials" that was recently organised…